WHY PERCABETH WOULD NEVER NAME THEIR OFFSPRING “LUKE”

Or Silena.

*** Also, this post has spoilers for The Last Olympian and basically every book after that. ***

Or anyone dead, really.

I’m sorry for yelling, but I am really a strong believer in this. Percy + Annabeth would not, in my opinion, name their child after one of their dead-friends, especially Luke.

I have nothing against Luke himself. He was good in the end. That’s great and all. But I think there is too much pain in the whole Luke topic for Percy or Annabeth to name their child after him. This is the case with Silena, too. I’ve read a lot of PJO fanfic where Percabeth names their daughter “Silena”. But it must be extremely painful for them to think about how one of their friends died. They sacrificed themselves. It’s a little hard to bring up the subject.

Not to mention that Annabeth used to have a crush on Luke. I don’t know how Percy would feel about that. I mean, imagine this:

You and someone you love have gotten married. (Congratulations, by the way.) Your child is born, and your spouse wants to name it after their ex-partner.

Isn’t that just a little bit awkward for you? Maybe? Especially in the case that it was a love triangle. (Er–quadrilateral. Rachel was there, too.)

So. Yeah. That’s all I had to say.

Love ya,

~ Lilou

c33f82b72fbe2d6c99c6964decb3fc6f.jpg

Credits to the artist! I don’t know who it is. Comment if you know.

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s